Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 01:52

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
How do military families balance personal political views with respect for civilian leadership?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What is the best reply if your boyfriend asks you,"why do you love me?"
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
A Researcher Figured Out How to Reveal Any Phone Number Linked to a Google Account - WIRED
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Stunning and mysterious 'red sprite' lightning storm captured in photos - Earth.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Invitation from Google hints at earlier than expected Pixel 10 release - PhoneArena
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.